Me: "So that missed drone strike in south Indianapolis that was supposed to cover up the evidence of the FEMA death camp* but hit the house instead? The Zionist Occupation Government covered it up by saying it was an 'insurance fraud gas explosion' and the sheeple believed it!"
RX: "You're on the dope, aren't you?"
Me: "No, I'm on the internet!"
Long pause...
Me: "I'm totally blogging this."
RX: "Okay, but if that rumor gets started, it's all your fault."
*I swear I read this someplace. Since all explosions are drone strikes, and the only thing Indianapolis is famous for in Reynolds Wrap yarmulke circles is the Beech Grove Amtrak repair yard, you can see how this surmise would occur. I also heard that it was a drone strike that was aimed at the Defense Finance and Accounting Center at Fort Ben to disrupt military pay for... well, some Underpants Gnome reason or another. Which is funny because while Greenwood and Lawrence could both be loosely referred to as "Indianapolis", they are some twenty-plus miles apart, which doesn't speak well to the accuracy of imaginary drones.
This is slightly off topic,but since you're up early,and snarky already,how bout the theory that the "gun appreciation day" last weekend was just a chance for the govt drones to get photos of all the gun owners,so the feebs could use facial recognition software to make a list and quantify,by region,where the hotspots will be?
ReplyDeleteBill
Or the one I saw the other day that the .gov is buying ALL the .223 ammo and storing it in Indy.
ReplyDeleteDid you get a street address?
ReplyDeleteThe Journal News will publish it tomorrow I'm sure.
ReplyDeleteAnd having been in the Finance Center multiple times I'd say they need a bit more than a single drone strike to take that place out. Maybe there was a pair of Predator IIs and they collided and fell on that house on their way up from Crane?
"Good" one Tam :-) You're on a roll this morning!
ReplyDeleteNo, no, you got it all right, Tam, but you missed the part about the internal power struggle between the CIA operating the drones and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency that provides the maps they used to plan the strike.
ReplyDeleteThis was pay back for the way the CIA tried to foist the blame for the B-2 bombing of the Belgrade Chinese embassy on NIMA, rather than just admit they were dropping the bombs on the spot where the INS system from the shot down F-117 was transmitting its locator beacon. The Chinese had been scouring the countryside, you see, buying the souvenir parts off the Yugoslavs to try to jumpstart their stealth aircraft program.
If you girls had a sitcom, I would totally watch it.
ReplyDeleteI am watching the sitcom in my head right now.
ReplyDeleteBut.. the gubmint DID buy up a huge amount of pistol ammo.....maybe this was an effort to deny the tin foil hat people self defense ammo?
That the hits were 20 miles apart indicates the multitarget capability of the drones, a huge plus in some circles of thought.
ReplyDeleteI think those circles are somewhere around the orbit of Pluto, but they at least are thinking positively!
Eainsdad,
ReplyDelete"But.. the gubmint DID buy up a huge amount of pistol ammo....."
Close. The government signed a contract giving them the option to buy up to a huge amount of ammo over a five-year period.
It's not as dramatic as it sounds when you do the math. It works out to considerably less ammo per agent per year than most USPSA shooters burn in a month.
The Tam and Bobbi show would be on one of the "reality" show channels, right after the one about the family in Louisiana that makes duck calls. The Indy blogmeets would turn into reservations-only affairs requiring extra security.
ReplyDeleteI'll tune my Tinfoil Hat to THAT show, f'r shure.
ReplyDeleteTam, thanks for the reminder that the gummint isn't buying ammo today, but locking in a price for the next five years.
ReplyDeleteYannow, the way we'd like to have been able to do a couple of years ago.
rickn8or,
ReplyDeleteI'm sure that if I'd been willing and able to commit to spending someone else's money on close to half a billion rounds, ATK would have been more than willing to work something out. ;)
(I'm also not entirely convinced that there isn't a bit of log-rolling and porkulus in there, as ATK had stepped up manufacturing greatly during the peak years of the Global War on a Noun, and with overseas operations winding down, they might have been thrown a bone.)
When nobody else can get ammo, I have a guy. For the past ten years, I've been able to walk in his door and buy whatevrer I want, in whatever quantities I want. I emailed him yesterday asking for a moderate sized order- some 5,000 rounds. Not small, but not big for me. I've bought far more from him in the past on many occasions.
ReplyDeletehe said "Six weeks"
It fills me with unequalled pride at my fellow Americans.
Hey, Og -- Wanna start a part-time bizzness? €BD}
DeleteWhen Tam has her own show, I handle security.
ReplyDelete...loved it. I hate the conspiracy types. As I told my brother again last night, I never ascribe to malfeasance what can be attributed to human stupidity and laziness, and that bit of critical thinking has served me well for the past 17 years.
While I'm not doubting you Tam, I'll wait till Jesse Ventura tells me the real truth.
ReplyDeleteGerry
Just as an FYI it's not in Greenwood. The house is apx 3 miles straight line from mine, but well within Marion county.
ReplyDeleteI'm still paranoid that they were aiming for me.
So this doesn't have anything to do with chemtrails, or the battalions of Eastern European mercenaries training in old salt mines?
ReplyDeleteI used to love playing Illuminati. . .
ReplyDeleteDope, internet, what's the difference anymore?
ReplyDeleteThe difference is the internet is full of dopes.L
ReplyDeleteWell, they are imaginary drones, so naturally all targeting solutions will have to be divided by i (or is it multiplied by?), which will... complicate things a bit.
ReplyDelete"...which doesn't speak well to the accuracy of imaginary drones."
ReplyDeleteBest part of imaginary drones is that they can be as precisely inaccurate as your scenario demands.
There's a point in every conspiracy theory (several points in most) where you find the classic line item consisting solely of question marks. Not to worry, the narrative picks right up afterwards as though what came before was cogent and logical.
My favorite response to the tinfoil hatters is "Right, that's what they want you to believe."
Jennifer said...
ReplyDeleteDope, internet, what's the difference anymore?
You only have to pay for your dope while you're actually getting it, and McDonalds doesn't pass out free smack.