Monday, June 03, 2013

Overheard in the Office...

Apparently someone on the televisor used the word "braggadocious" to disparage someone else:
RX: "'Braggadocious'? 'Braggadocious'?"

Me: "Don't you think using 'braggadocious' in a sentence is a little grandiose?"

RX: "I don't think it's even a word."
It's not.

28 comments:

  1. Paging Mary Poppins. Please pick up the red phone

    ReplyDelete
  2. Maybe they meant that the other TV idiot was "braggadoucheious". I would have given ten points to forming that as a new word.

    I wish I could say I were surprised, but I have taught so-called "communications" majors who plan to go into TV. Most can't write their way out of a paper bag.

    -Rob

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, we do speak a living language. If it successfully communicates the meaning, and other people understand what you mean when you use it, it is a word – no matter how much the purists scream.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've had the "honor" of being interviewed three times by "proffesional reportists" all three got it wrong and one was a woman I'd known for more than thirty years. None could write three paragraphs without at least one egregious grammatical error and two serious misspellings.

    So much for a kolege edumakashon.

    Gerry N.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It's in the online OED in the American English section.

    http://oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/braggadocious

    ReplyDelete
  6. Heard on the radio, last night,

    "Tragesty."

    Must be a combination of "tragedy" and "travesty".

    Perhaps.

    Secret Code: dditstr creature

    Wasn't that the villain in one of the Cthulhu novels, maybe one of the ones by August Derleth perhaps?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Was the adjective being used to describe ta-tas?

    ReplyDelete
  8. It's a great coinage, as good as "beclowned". I welcome it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Someone needs more schooling.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Braggadocio is a word. Braggadicious is the obvious adjective construction following standard English rules.

    It's totally a word, as perlhaqr said.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Its root has been a word for more than 500 years.

    late 16th century (denoting a boaster): from Braggadocchio, the name of a braggart in Spenser's The Faerie Queene, from brag or braggart + the Italian suffix -occio, denoting something large of its kind

    ReplyDelete
  12. Stuart the Viking2:51 PM, June 03, 2013

    This is exactly how words are added to our language. They are made-up by someone and then propagate through the complaints of people who don't like made-up words until the new word pervades the collective consciousness.

    It's a perfectly cromulent way of getting a new word.

    That said, I personally don't really care for the word braggadocious. It seems a little superfluous.

    s

    ReplyDelete
  13. You're just trying to caricaturize the talking heads on the teevee. ;)

    Srsly though, what anon 10:37 and others have said here. It's a living thing; let it breathe.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Why object to embiggening our language?

    ReplyDelete
  15. 1911Man,

    Yes, I am aware that "braggadocio" is a valid noun. Thank you.

    The Rest of you members of Pedants Against Pedantry: I use words that aren't words all the time. "Embigennated", in the post below this one, is frequently used by me in both written and spoken forms. It is not a word. Puzzle that out. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  16. Rules are for thee, not for me. Got it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. "Rules are for thee, not for me. Got it."

    What rules? Are you making up rules again?

    ReplyDelete
  18. Once again, the internets makes a wonderful Rorschach Test... Maybe if people just read what I wrote without front-loading it with all their own interpretations. I especially like the "Rules are for thee, not for me" guy. You need to seek some help, dude.

    ReplyDelete
  19. If we've decided to add "braggadocious", I hereby propose "braggadoucheious" as well. Probably both words describe the same class of individuals, but I my version adds a little more 21st century cultural contextual flair.

    -Rob

    ReplyDelete
  20. RevolverRob,

    "I hereby propose "braggadoucheious" as well."

    While not a word, it definitely should be.

    I hereby swear to do my part to work it into the ver-NA-kyoo-lǝr. :)

    ReplyDelete
  21. Hey Tam, a short while back, I was showing one of your posts to my Mom... I went to "imbiggenate" the pic and she wondered what kind of word that was or if I was making it up.

    I had heard of a braggadocio before. I guess there's an academic version that likes to impress everybody with big words... probably prays to himself that nobody figures out how jejune he is. I was under the impression though that most braggadocios were more likely swashbucklers than pontificationists. It's been a while since I'd seen the word in use.

    ReplyDelete
  22. "While not a word, it definitely should be."

    Prexactly.

    wv"satiric" Heh.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Was it a tornadic flurry of braggadocious?

    Dann in Ohio

    ReplyDelete
  24. I think most of us are aware of your Cromulence, Tam.

    We were just having some fun.

    ReplyDelete
  25. In the charade version of "Braggadocious" the person explaining the word would denote 5 syllables, then adopt the mien of Bill Clinton for an instant win.

    Now that I think about it, works for the "Braggadoucheous" version, too.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Just a quick update, my friend and I went to partake in a Döner kebab this afternoon for lunch. As we drove through the parking lot, we observed a Ferrari 458 sitting in the lot, parked across three spaces in a very crowded lot.

    I turned to my friend and said, "Ha look at that braggadoucheious park job on that Ferrari!" My friend's immediate reaction was, "Braggadoucheious?! New word. I love it."

    Successful introduction of this new word.

    -Rob

    ReplyDelete
  27. I dunno Rob, the Notaword dictionary defines it as "adj. relating to direct or immediate action or commentary of inflated and abrasive importance of self." Seems he'd have to be physically in the car sneering at the little people to qualify for this elevated status and not just a regular prick. Close though.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I present to you an alternative pronunciation: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRrgJdoHuBU

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.