Friday, February 15, 2008

Says it all, really...

The gunman paused to reload his shotgun after opening fire on a crowd of terrified students...

24 comments:

  1. But we have taught kids for 30 years fighting is bad, todays kids don't have a clue about fighting.
    Some old country school he would hav likely been tackled from a couple of directions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The sad thing is that should read "The gunman gave an opportunity for his intended victims to return fire".

    *sigh*

    It's the guns' faults though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wonder if the prozac deprived grad student lied on his application( i.e. mental question) for his Illinois FOID card? How would you like to be the Champaign, Il. gun store owner that sold him the weapons last week?.....the ammo.....? I can hardly wait for the medias rack to start tightening on this one...God I'm glad I don't live in Illinois.

    ReplyDelete
  4. When I was working psych back in the dark ages, the jail would bring prisoners by the county clinic for their meds. We'd do depot injections of antipsychotics that would last a couple of months, since they were given deep in the buttocks muscle, in a viscous solution of sesame oil. Mostly Haldol.

    It'd keep them from being so bugnuts for anywhere from 2 to 3 months. Kinda makes you wonder why that's not more widely done with folks who might not be compliant with oral meds.

    ....but we'd get in trouble for fighting! It's in the student handbook, right above 'no weapons on campus'...

    Regards,
    Rabbit.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Child molesters go into teaching, guys looking for hit and run relationships find girls with low self-esteem, drug dealers sell in schoolyards, and lunatics go to where they know they can gun people down without the threat of returned fire.

    Welcome to Predatory Instinct 101. Go where the pickin's good.

    ReplyDelete
  6. According to a news report I heard this morning, police recovered 48 pistol cases and six shotgun hulls from the crime scene.

    The school reports that campus police responded in "two minutes."

    Fifty-two rounds in two minutes or so. Yep, I'd say he paused to reload at least once. But everyone either ran or put their faces to the floor and waited to die.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The school reports that campus police responded in "two minutes.

    When seconds count, help's only minutes away

    ReplyDelete
  8. Sounds like he had more than 2 minutes to me.

    Regardless, I expect that we will now see calls to modify the language in that recent NICS improvement act. He likely had not been adjudicated as mentally ill. Therefore the call will be for ANYONE who has EVER seen a psych professional to be disallowed the ownership of arms.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Even in that totally-disarmed situation, the students had a selection of projectile weapons at hand. (Backpacks, textbooks, etc.)

    If not used as projectiles, a backpack might work as a partial shield against buckshot.

    And they outnumbered him!

    Yes, things would have gone much better if the teacher had evaded the first blast and pumped him full of 0.45 FMJ.

    Things would have gone a little better if everyone had decided to charge the gunman while he was reloading.

    What is this world coming to?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I don't get the cower and freeze reaction.

    I thought the instinct was supposed to be fight or flight, not curl up and die.

    I'm with Matt on this one.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I work in DeKalb, about 2 miles away from NIU, it's a fucked up situation to say the least. Watching TV and seeing the same campus that I've walked is an exceedingly weird feeling. It's too bad this whole damn state is a fish-in-a-barrel zone...

    ReplyDelete
  12. I love the part about medications...and him being "so normal". Medication for what? Eventually I suspect more info will come out to show, yes, this guy exhibited warning signs like most of these types of folks did.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The headline in the Omaha paper was (in 2" high bold letters) "Run! He's reloading!"

    grrrr.......

    would that it had been "He's reloading! Kill him!

    ReplyDelete
  14. What do you do with a rabid dog ?

    Some people just don't get it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. First comment but I have been lurking for a long time. I was a 49 year old student when the Tech shooting went down so I started gaming what I would do. Backpack full of books and a motorcycle helmet made a good shield and weapon.

    I called my kids who were also in college and told them if they ever hear of a shooting at my school to know I will be running to the gunfire. If I could save some of our young adults at the cost of this old farts body so be it. My son, bless him, said he would be right behind me. Raised him right I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  16. The FOID sounds like something I'd have to get here, in the P D R of Canastan. Fortunately, it seems that they are "rarely issued to people with recent mental health problems". Well alright then!

    ReplyDelete
  17. He looks right wimpy, actually. I'll bet just a couple of men or very large boys could have subdued him by rushing him with chairs or text books or something. Then there's the tried-and-true classic dogpile.

    ReplyDelete
  18. alan -

    "fight or flight" is not really accurate. The instinct is actually fight / flight / freeze. Dave Grossman's _On Killing_ gives a good layman's explanation, as does Ellis Amdur's work, but basically...

    Human faces a threat. The three options are fight, flight, or freeze. Each is sometimes appropriate (fight a stranger in your home, run from a knife on the street, freeze when you see a grizzly bear pass by who has not noticed you).

    The instinct is fight, flight, or freeze. All viable options in different scenarios.

    Note, though, that "freeze" doesn't equal "cower."

    bookmoth

    ReplyDelete
  19. "You can kill me - but don't expect any assistance!"

    ReplyDelete
  20. Next line should have read:

    "... and then he was beaten unconscious with a metal folding chair. Suspect is still in intensive care with a serious concussion."

    ReplyDelete
  21. Maybe the next line could and should also read "someone took his gun away from him... and then fed it to him".

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.