Monday, May 26, 2008

Pretend you don't see this.

In the interest of good taste, I've been staying away from the whole grimly unfolding Senator Kennedy saga. I'll only pause for a moment to wonder why not one of his benighted generation could die in an unsympathetic or non-mediagenic fashion. Given their demonstrated proclivities, what are the odds of an entire cohort of this noted family of substance-abusing, philandering demagogues escaping jealous husbands, cirrhosis of the liver, ruptured aneurisms while sharing a bed with someone of tenuous morals, or Herpes Simplex 1, 2, 12, and 14 through 25, inclusive? Instead, the Evel Knievel of Chappaquidick appears headed for a grim end, one which I wouldn't wish on... well, even a Kennedy.

There have been darkly humorous side effects, however.

A David Broder column reprinted in the Indy Star the other day contained the line
"In his 46 years in the Senate, Kennedy has probably touched more people, in more cherished ways, than any other public figure."
...and before I could stop, I heard myself mutter "They never proved that in court!"

More locally, the Bolshevik wing of the Democrat party has been unmoored enough by the (as they see it) tragedy that they feel forced into public proclamations of their historical ignorance:
Tens, if not hundreds, of thousands of innocent people in Vietnam, Iraq and elsewhere have died because of the policy of perpetual war we have lived in under Republican rule for the last 40 years.
Because we all remember how those noted GOP dictators, JFK and LBJ, used the might of the Republican-dominated Congress under neocon strongmen John McCormack, Carl Albert, and Tip O'Neill to wage unconscionable wars...

Lord, please make my enemies ridiculous. Thank you.

7 comments:

  1. The Democrat Congressional vote to cut off aid to South Vietnam, led by people like Ted Kennedy and the party directly contributed to MILLIONS of deaths in Southeast Asia after the fall of The Republic of South Vietnam.

    These people have blood, old and fresh, on their hands.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I had something to say about this a while back:
    http://pergelator.blogspot.com/2004/01/who-was-good-president-and-who-wasnt.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ah, but they don't need the Lord's help to look ridiculous.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ok, so today it will be a Mosin-Nagant not a Carcano but you guys are really letting things slip, surely.

    ReplyDelete
  5. for liberals history is just like facts. It's only relevant when it supports their argument.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I've just been going with the ever-so-tasteful, "Mary Jo Kopechne was unavailable for comment."

    ReplyDelete
  7. I was goign to say what Anonymous said, we have the Democrats to thank for Pol-Pot and Darfur.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.