1) 1.7% of people are quantum physicists who figured out how to score 26/25, or 2) I was docked points for admitting to being a girl, or 3) The test itself is a little dense.
Smarter than 99.2% - HAHA - Some of y'all are dumber 'n me.
That's not exactly what I'd call comprehensive. If speed is involved I'm even less impressed. Thinking quickly has gotten me into more trouble than it has gotten me out of.
No 1.7% of people got all 25 right - you are NOT smarter than them, you are only smarter than the people who missed 1 or more.
Of course that means you aren't as smart as the people who understand how percentiles work. (You can't be smarter than 100% of the population since you are part of the population.... unless you can be smarter than yourself.)
Man, I am the dumbest. Because the "start" button didn't change the cursor to the click hand in Firefox, I clicked on an ad the first time I ran through it and ended up taking another test that had pages and pages of opt-ins.
And then I missed one the second time I tried, and succeeded, in taking the test you linked to.
Apparently time is a factor, as my 25/25 just came up as "smarter than 99.4%". I also noticed several misspellings and grammatical errors in the questions.
Also, the damnthing is USA-centric. Fine for you folks, but I don't particularly care which of Reagan, Nixon, or who it all was has died, will die, or when they died (OK, take this sentence out and shoot it).
Also, I spent too much time trying to figure out where the trick in the question was before figuring out there was no trick.
25 comments:
I am smarter than 97.94% of the rest of the world. Find out how smart you are.
I also got 25/25. I think it factors in completion time.
Or maybe only 1.7% of the population scores 25 out of 25 questions?
And you don't need to pay a $200 NFA tax for this quiz, either.
The percentages are measuring only that group of people who are taking this test?
This would cause the numbers to change as more people take the test.
Since I score 25/25 as well, I feel there is a need for a tie-breaker.
I therefore offer this as a tie-breaker to prove my immense intellect:
"You have more guns than I do, Tam. You win."
You're smarter than me, I'm going to the Rendezvous - how smart is that?
Also 25/25, smarter than 98.96%. No pride, though- not the most difficult examination I ever took.
I'm smarter than 100%. Impressive!
Time is of the essence, Tam. If you stick all the questions, the only variable left is how long you take to do so.
It's a reading speed/hand-eye coordination test.
24/25, which annoys me because now I don't know which one I missed.
since it is a percentile, if 100 people take the test and all but 1 score 25/25 then you are smarter than 1% of the population
-steve_in_CA
Well, I got 25/25 and 99.35%. Satanam may be right, there could be a time component to the scoring.
Or, the scoring is just messed up.
Smarter than 99.2% - HAHA - Some of y'all are dumber 'n me.
That's not exactly what I'd call comprehensive. If speed is involved I'm even less impressed. Thinking quickly has gotten me into more trouble than it has gotten me out of.
Keith
No 1.7% of people got all 25 right - you are NOT smarter than them, you are only smarter than the people who missed 1 or more.
Of course that means you aren't as smart as the people who understand how percentiles work. (You can't be smarter than 100% of the population since you are part of the population.... unless you can be smarter than yourself.)
I am smarter than 97.40% of the rest of the world. Find out how smart you are.
I don't consider myself all that smart, but I got:
Your Number Correct:25/25
You are smarter than 99.80% of the populaton.
Are you a genius? Find out!
Average Number Correct: 18.5/25
Percentile: 99.80%
Time Taken: 1:13
It seems time is also a factor in the scores.
Apparently the two minutes I spent staring out the window, talking to the cat, and making up snarky answers counted against my score...
Did you notice they misspelled population?
Well, you can't tear through that test much faster than I did unless you're not reading the questions, and I got 25/25 but only a 97.88%.
IMnsHO, the only ignorant bugger is the guy who designed the scoring methodology.
Kudos to bryan. Many, in this distinguished company, would just lie. HST, I also got them all right (you do believe me now?) and was given 98.3%.
Speed is a factor but it's not how fast you answer. It's how fast your cat is going...
They're allowing for the number of people who are smart enough to do something else with their time.
:p
I posted a screen shot. And I still claim bragging rights.
So, there!
(Ducking and running)
It seems they might also be also factoring in race and gender.
I think Adrian nailed it:
"IMnsHO, the only ignorant bugger is the guy who designed the scoring methodology."
Man, I am the dumbest. Because the "start" button didn't change the cursor to the click hand in Firefox, I clicked on an ad the first time I ran through it and ended up taking another test that had pages and pages of opt-ins.
And then I missed one the second time I tried, and succeeded, in taking the test you linked to.
I'll take a score of zero, for not bothering with the silly thing.
Apparently time is a factor, as my 25/25 just came up as "smarter than 99.4%". I also noticed several misspellings and grammatical errors in the questions.
farmist
Yea I wondered why they needed your gender too.
Also, the damnthing is USA-centric. Fine for you folks, but I don't particularly care which of Reagan, Nixon, or who it all was has died, will die, or when they died (OK, take this sentence out and shoot it).
Also, I spent too much time trying to figure out where the trick in the question was before figuring out there was no trick.
Post a Comment